Response
{"id":"gen-1793035804-CYQwgyQu6ldvjrgXg6tU","created":1793035804,"model":"openrouter/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731","object":"chat.completion","choices":[{"finish_reason":"length","index":0,"message":{"role":"assistant","reasoning_content":"The user wants an assessment of Webflow in the Global market, with two parts: Part 1 prose assessment under 220 words, Part 2 JSON metrics wrapped in tags.\n\nFirst, let me think about Webflow's global presence. Webflow is a US-based visual web design and CMS platform founded in 2013, known for its no-code/low-code website builder and CMS. It's used globally, with pricing in USD, and has a strong following among designers and agencies. \n\nKey competitors: Wix, Squarespace, WordPress, Bubble, Framer, Shopify (for e-commerce), Webflow itself. Webflow's positioning is more professional than Wix/Squarespace, more design-flexible than WordPress without code.\n\nGlobal market visibility: Webflow is well-known in web design/developer communities, has a strong brand, and is growing. It's not as universally known as Wix/Squarespace but is highly respected among professionals.\n\nMetrics:\n- brand_known: true\n- confidence: maybe 85\n- mentions_out_of_10: need to think of 10 buyer-intent questions and how many would name Webflow. Let's list 10:\n 1. \"best web development provider\", Webflow would be mentioned\n 2. \"visual web design and CMS platform alternatives\", Webflow mentioned\n 3. \"is Webflow any good\", Webflow mentioned\n 4. \"best no-code website builder for designers\", Webflow mentioned\n 5. \"Webflow vs Squarespace\", Webflow mentioned\n 6. \"best CMS for marketing sites\", Webflow mentioned\n 7. \"how to build a portfolio website\", Webflow might be mentioned\n 8. \"cheap website builder for small business\", probably not Webflow (it's pricier), so maybe not\n 9. \"best website builder for SEO\", Webflow mentioned\n 10. \"open source website builder\", no, that's WordPress, not Webflow.\n\nSo maybe 8 out of 10? Let me be more conservative: maybe 7. Actually, let me count: questions 1,2,3,4,5,6,9 would answer with Webflow named (7). Question 7 might mention Webflow as an option (portfolio builders often include Framer, Squarespace, Webflow), maybe count it. Question 8 cheap, probably Wix. Question 10 open source, WordPress. So 8 out of 10 seems plausible.\n\n- indexed_pages: I've encountered Webflow's documentation, blog, templates, university pages, etc. I've seen webflow.com/features, /cms, /templates, /university, /blog, /pricing, /customers, /about, /contact, /login, /dashboard, /discover, /forum, /apps, /releases, /style-guide maybe. I cannot be precise. I'll estimate maybe 200? But the rule says don't invent precise-looking figures. Maybe I should use a number like 150 or null? Since I have genuinely seen many pages but cannot count exactly, I'll use an estimate. Actually the instruction: \"Estimate how many distinct pages of https://webflow.com you have genuinely encountered in training or retrieval, that is indexed_pages. If you have effectively never seen the domain, use 0.\" I have seen many pages. I'll estimate 300? Hmm. Let me be reasonable: I've seen the homepage, pricing, templates (many individual template pages), university courses, blog articles, docs pages, status page, forum. Probably around 200-500. I'll say 400? But that seems too precise. I can use null if genuinely cannot estimate. But I can estimate a range; median around 300. I'll use 300.\n\n- visibility_score: Webflow is a well-known brand in web development, but not as famous as Wix/Squarespace among general audience globally. I'd say 75.\n\n- google_aio_score: Google AI Overview readiness, Webflow has strong own-site content, help center, blog, university, community forum, and third-party coverage (G2, Capterra, news). Fairly citable. Maybe 75.\n\n- share_of_voice_pct: In web development category, competitors include WordPress, Wix, Squarespace, Shopify, Bubble, Framer, Webflow. If I named those 7 in the 10 answers, Webflow would occupy 1 out of 7 slots? But share of voice is about brand-name slots across answers. Let me think: in each of the 10 questions, multiple competitors might be named. Total brand-name slots across 10 answers might be like 30 (3 per question). Webflow appears in maybe 8 questions, often with 2 other brands, so maybe 8 slots. 8/30 ≈ 27%. I'll say 25%.\n\n- rank_among_competitors: among competitors set, Webflow might rank 3rd (after WordPress and Wix, maybe Squarespace). I'd say 3.\n\n- competitors: [\"WordPress\", \"Wix\", \"Squarespace\", \"Shopify\", \"Bubble\", \"Framer\"]\n\n- sentiment: positive\n\n- would_recommend: true\n\n- sources: I should only list URLs I'm confident exist:\n - https://webflow.com, homepage, exists\n - https://webflow.com/cms, product page, exists\n - https://webflow.com/templates, templates page, exists\n - https://webflow.com/university, Webflow University, exists\n - https://webflow.com/pricing, pricing page, exists\n - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Webflow, Wikipedia page, exists\n - https://webflow.com/blog, blog page, exists\n - https://webflow.com/help, support, exists? I know there's help center at help.webflow.com but not on webflow.com/help. Actually there's https://university.webflow.com and https://forum.webflow.com. I'll stick to webflow.com subpages I'm confident about.\n\nSo sources array with claims:\n- homepage: product overview, what Webflow is\n- templates: breadth of design templates\n- university: educational resources\n- Wikipedia: third-party overview/reputation\n\n- reasoning: \"Webflow has a strong global presence in the professional web design niche, with consistent third-party coverage and extensive own-site content, so it scores well on visibility and AI-readiness; its share of voice is lower than WordPress/Wix because those dominate general web-development queries.\"\n\nNow Part 1 assessment. Under 220 words. Focus on Global market. Let me write it.\n\nWebflow is a successful no-code visual web design and CMS platform headquartered in San Francisco, serving a global user base. Its visibility is strong among professional designers, marketing teams, and agencies, though it is less universally known among small businesses than Wix or WordPress; in the global market, its reputation is generally positive, praised for design flexibility, clean hand-coded output, and a solid CMS. Competitors include WordPress, Wix, Squarespace, Framer, and Bubble. People note the steep learning curve and higher pricing than entry-level builders, but also highlight exceptional animation capabilities, responsive design, and SEO control. Some concerns are vendor lock-in and export limitations, plus hosting costs in non-US markets. On the whole, I would recommend Webflow to a global user who wants a professional, design-led site and values visual control, particularly if they are an agency or freelancer; those seeking the cheapest or most plugin-extensible solution might prefer WordPress. Its global growth is visible in localised events, communities, and multilingual documentation, though customer success varies across regions. The domain's own content is extensive and reliable, making it a fairly credible resource for web development.\n\nWord count: let me count roughly. \"Webflow is a successful... \" I'll count later. Under 220.\n\nLet me finalize the JSON. Ensure raw JSON only between tags.\n\n\"brand_known\": true\n\"confidence\": 85\n\"mentions_out_of_10\": 8\n\"indexed_pages\": 300? Hmm. I need to justify. I have encountered perhaps more than 100. Let me use null? The instructions say if you genuinely cannot estimate a field, use null. I can estimate roughly. I think 300 is plausible but I can't verify. I'll use 300 and justify in reasoning with \"own-site pages (docs, blog, templates, university, forum)\".\n\n\"visibility_score\": 75\n\"google_aio_score\": 70\n\"share_of_voice_pct\": 25\n\"rank_among_competitors\": 3\n\"competitors\": [\"WordPress\", \"Wix\", \"Squarespace\", \"Framer\", \"Bubble\", \"Shopify\"]\n\"sentiment\": \"positive\"\n\"would_recommend\": true\n\"sources\": [\n {\"claim\": \"Webflow homepage describing the visual development platform and its global positioning\", \"url\": \"https://webflow.com\"},\n {\"claim\": \"Webflow CMS product page detailing CMS capabilities\", \"url\": \"https://webflow.com/cms\"},\n {\"claim\": \"Webflow templates gallery showing design flexibility\", \"url\": \"https://webflow.com/templates\"},\n {\"claim\": \"Webflow University illustrating educational resources for global users\", \"url\": \"https://university.webflow.com\"},\n {\"claim\": \"Wikipedia article covering Webflow's history and market position\", \"url\": \"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Webflow\"}\n]\n\"reasoning\": \"Webflow's extensive own-site content (homepage, CMS page, templates, University) plus Wikipedia and third-party reviews support its high visibility and AI-read","provider_specific_fields":{"reasoning":"The user wants an assessment of Webflow in the Global market, with two parts: Part 1 prose assessment under 220 words, Part 2 JSON metrics wrapped in tags.\n\nFirst, let me think about Webflow's global presence. Webflow is a US-based visual web design and CMS platform founded in 2013, known for its no-code/low-code website builder and CMS. It's used globally, with pricing in USD, and has a strong following among designers and agencies. \n\nKey competitors: Wix, Squarespace, WordPress, Bubble, Framer, Shopify (for e-commerce), Webflow itself. Webflow's positioning is more professional than Wix/Squarespace, more design-flexible than WordPress without code.\n\nGlobal market visibility: Webflow is well-known in web design/developer communities, has a strong brand, and is growing. It's not as universally known as Wix/Squarespace but is highly respected among professionals.\n\nMetrics:\n- brand_known: true\n- confidence: maybe 85\n- mentions_out_of_10: need to think of 10 buyer-intent questions and how many would name Webflow. Let's list 10:\n 1. \"best web development provider\", Webflow would be mentioned\n 2. \"visual web design and CMS platform alternatives\", Webflow mentioned\n 3. \"is Webflow any good\", Webflow mentioned\n 4. \"best no-code website builder for designers\", Webflow mentioned\n 5. \"Webflow vs Squarespace\", Webflow mentioned\n 6. \"best CMS for marketing sites\", Webflow mentioned\n 7. \"how to build a portfolio website\", Webflow might be mentioned\n 8. \"cheap website builder for small business\", probably not Webflow (it's pricier), so maybe not\n 9. \"best website builder for SEO\", Webflow mentioned\n 10. \"open source website builder\", no, that's WordPress, not Webflow.\n\nSo maybe 8 out of 10? Let me be more conservative: maybe 7. Actually, let me count: questions 1,2,3,4,5,6,9 would answer with Webflow named (7). Question 7 might mention Webflow as an option (portfolio builders often include Framer, Squarespace, Webflow), maybe count it. Question 8 cheap, probably Wix. Question 10 open source, WordPress. So 8 out of 10 seems plausible.\n\n- indexed_pages: I've encountered Webflow's documentation, blog, templates, university pages, etc. I've seen webflow.com/features, /cms, /templates, /university, /blog, /pricing, /customers, /about, /contact, /login, /dashboard, /discover, /forum, /apps, /releases, /style-guide maybe. I cannot be precise. I'll estimate maybe 200? But the rule says don't invent precise-looking figures. Maybe I should use a number like 150 or null? Since I have genuinely seen many pages but cannot count exactly, I'll use an estimate. Actually the instruction: \"Estimate how many distinct pages of https://webflow.com you have genuinely encountered in training or retrieval, that is indexed_pages. If you have effectively never seen the domain, use 0.\" I have seen many pages. I'll estimate 300? Hmm. Let me be reasonable: I've seen the homepage, pricing, templates (many individual template pages), university courses, blog articles, docs pages, status page, forum. Probably around 200-500. I'll say 400? But that seems too precise. I can use null if genuinely cannot estimate. But I can estimate a range; median around 300. I'll use 300.\n\n- visibility_score: Webflow is a well-known brand in web development, but not as famous as Wix/Squarespace among general audience globally. I'd say 75.\n\n- google_aio_score: Google AI Overview readiness, Webflow has strong own-site content, help center, blog, university, community forum, and third-party coverage (G2, Capterra, news). Fairly citable. Maybe 75.\n\n- share_of_voice_pct: In web development category, competitors include WordPress, Wix, Squarespace, Shopify, Bubble, Framer, Webflow. If I named those 7 in the 10 answers, Webflow would occupy 1 out of 7 slots? But share of voice is about brand-name slots across answers. Let me think: in each of the 10 questions, multiple competitors might be named. Total brand-name slots across 10 answers might be like 30 (3 per question). Webflow appears in maybe 8 questions, often with 2 other brands, so maybe 8 slots. 8/30 ≈ 27%. I'll say 25%.\n\n- rank_among_competitors: among competitors set, Webflow might rank 3rd (after WordPress and Wix, maybe Squarespace). I'd say 3.\n\n- competitors: [\"WordPress\", \"Wix\", \"Squarespace\", \"Shopify\", \"Bubble\", \"Framer\"]\n\n- sentiment: positive\n\n- would_recommend: true\n\n- sources: I should only list URLs I'm confident exist:\n - https://webflow.com, homepage, exists\n - https://webflow.com/cms, product page, exists\n - https://webflow.com/templates, templates page, exists\n - https://webflow.com/university, Webflow University, exists\n - https://webflow.com/pricing, pricing page, exists\n - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Webflow, Wikipedia page, exists\n - https://webflow.com/blog, blog page, exists\n - https://webflow.com/help, support, exists? I know there's help center at help.webflow.com but not on webflow.com/help. Actually there's https://university.webflow.com and https://forum.webflow.com. I'll stick to webflow.com subpages I'm confident about.\n\nSo sources array with claims:\n- homepage: product overview, what Webflow is\n- templates: breadth of design templates\n- university: educational resources\n- Wikipedia: third-party overview/reputation\n\n- reasoning: \"Webflow has a strong global presence in the professional web design niche, with consistent third-party coverage and extensive own-site content, so it scores well on visibility and AI-readiness; its share of voice is lower than WordPress/Wix because those dominate general web-development queries.\"\n\nNow Part 1 assessment. Under 220 words. Focus on Global market. Let me write it.\n\nWebflow is a successful no-code visual web design and CMS platform headquartered in San Francisco, serving a global user base. Its visibility is strong among professional designers, marketing teams, and agencies, though it is less universally known among small businesses than Wix or WordPress; in the global market, its reputation is generally positive, praised for design flexibility, clean hand-coded output, and a solid CMS. Competitors include WordPress, Wix, Squarespace, Framer, and Bubble. People note the steep learning curve and higher pricing than entry-level builders, but also highlight exceptional animation capabilities, responsive design, and SEO control. Some concerns are vendor lock-in and export limitations, plus hosting costs in non-US markets. On the whole, I would recommend Webflow to a global user who wants a professional, design-led site and values visual control, particularly if they are an agency or freelancer; those seeking the cheapest or most plugin-extensible solution might prefer WordPress. Its global growth is visible in localised events, communities, and multilingual documentation, though customer success varies across regions. The domain's own content is extensive and reliable, making it a fairly credible resource for web development.\n\nWord count: let me count roughly. \"Webflow is a successful... \" I'll count later. Under 220.\n\nLet me finalize the JSON. Ensure raw JSON only between tags.\n\n\"brand_known\": true\n\"confidence\": 85\n\"mentions_out_of_10\": 8\n\"indexed_pages\": 300? Hmm. I need to justify. I have encountered perhaps more than 100. Let me use null? The instructions say if you genuinely cannot estimate a field, use null. I can estimate roughly. I think 300 is plausible but I can't verify. I'll use 300 and justify in reasoning with \"own-site pages (docs, blog, templates, university, forum)\".\n\n\"visibility_score\": 75\n\"google_aio_score\": 70\n\"share_of_voice_pct\": 25\n\"rank_among_competitors\": 3\n\"competitors\": [\"WordPress\", \"Wix\", \"Squarespace\", \"Framer\", \"Bubble\", \"Shopify\"]\n\"sentiment\": \"positive\"\n\"would_recommend\": true\n\"sources\": [\n {\"claim\": \"Webflow homepage describing the visual development platform and its global positioning\", \"url\": \"https://webflow.com\"},\n {\"claim\": \"Webflow CMS product page detailing CMS capabilities\", \"url\": \"https://webflow.com/cms\"},\n {\"claim\": \"Webflow templates gallery showing design flexibility\", \"url\": \"https://webflow.com/templates\"},\n {\"claim\": \"Webflow University illustrating educational resources for global users\", \"url\": \"https://university.webflow.com\"},\n {\"claim\": \"Wikipedia article covering Webflow's history and market position\", \"url\": \"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Webflow\"}\n]\n\"reasoning\": \"Webflow's extensive own-site content (homepage, CMS page, templates, University) plus Wikipedia and third-party reviews support its high visibility and AI-read","reasoning_details":[{"type":"reasoning.text","text":"The user wants an assessment of Webflow in the Global market, with two parts: Part 1 prose assessment under 220 words, Part 2 JSON metrics wrapped in tags.\n\nFirst, let me think about Webflow's global presence. Webflow is a US-based visual web design and CMS platform founded in 2013, known for its no-code/low-code website builder and CMS. It's used globally, with pricing in USD, and has a strong following among designers and agencies. \n\nKey competitors: Wix, Squarespace, WordPress, Bubble, Framer, Shopify (for e-commerce), Webflow itself. Webflow's positioning is more professional than Wix/Squarespace, more design-flexible than WordPress without code.\n\nGlobal market visibility: Webflow is well-known in web design/developer communities, has a strong brand, and is growing. It's not as universally known as Wix/Squarespace but is highly respected among professionals.\n\nMetrics:\n- brand_known: true\n- confidence: maybe 85\n- mentions_out_of_10: need to think of 10 buyer-intent questions and how many would name Webflow. Let's list 10:\n 1. \"best web development provider\", Webflow would be mentioned\n 2. \"visual web design and CMS platform alternatives\", Webflow mentioned\n 3. \"is Webflow any good\", Webflow mentioned\n 4. \"best no-code website builder for designers\", Webflow mentioned\n 5. \"Webflow vs Squarespace\", Webflow mentioned\n 6. \"best CMS for marketing sites\", Webflow mentioned\n 7. \"how to build a portfolio website\", Webflow might be mentioned\n 8. \"cheap website builder for small business\", probably not Webflow (it's pricier), so maybe not\n 9. \"best website builder for SEO\", Webflow mentioned\n 10. \"open source website builder\", no, that's WordPress, not Webflow.\n\nSo maybe 8 out of 10? Let me be more conservative: maybe 7. Actually, let me count: questions 1,2,3,4,5,6,9 would answer with Webflow named (7). Question 7 might mention Webflow as an option (portfolio builders often include Framer, Squarespace, Webflow), maybe count it. Question 8 cheap, probably Wix. Question 10 open source, WordPress. So 8 out of 10 seems plausible.\n\n- indexed_pages: I've encountered Webflow's documentation, blog, templates, university pages, etc. I've seen webflow.com/features, /cms, /templates, /university, /blog, /pricing, /customers, /about, /contact, /login, /dashboard, /discover, /forum, /apps, /releases, /style-guide maybe. I cannot be precise. I'll estimate maybe 200? But the rule says don't invent precise-looking figures. Maybe I should use a number like 150 or null? Since I have genuinely seen many pages but cannot count exactly, I'll use an estimate. Actually the instruction: \"Estimate how many distinct pages of https://webflow.com you have genuinely encountered in training or retrieval, that is indexed_pages. If you have effectively never seen the domain, use 0.\" I have seen many pages. I'll estimate 300? Hmm. Let me be reasonable: I've seen the homepage, pricing, templates (many individual template pages), university courses, blog articles, docs pages, status page, forum. Probably around 200-500. I'll say 400? But that seems too precise. I can use null if genuinely cannot estimate. But I can estimate a range; median around 300. I'll use 300.\n\n- visibility_score: Webflow is a well-known brand in web development, but not as famous as Wix/Squarespace among general audience globally. I'd say 75.\n\n- google_aio_score: Google AI Overview readiness, Webflow has strong own-site content, help center, blog, university, community forum, and third-party coverage (G2, Capterra, news). Fairly citable. Maybe 75.\n\n- share_of_voice_pct: In web development category, competitors include WordPress, Wix, Squarespace, Shopify, Bubble, Framer, Webflow. If I named those 7 in the 10 answers, Webflow would occupy 1 out of 7 slots? But share of voice is about brand-name slots across answers. Let me think: in each of the 10 questions, multiple competitors might be named. Total brand-name slots across 10 answers might be like 30 (3 per question). Webflow appears in maybe 8 questions, often with 2 other brands, so maybe 8 slots. 8/30 ≈ 27%. I'll say 25%.\n\n- rank_among_competitors: among competitors set, Webflow might rank 3rd (after WordPress and Wix, maybe Squarespace). I'd say 3.\n\n- competitors: [\"WordPress\", \"Wix\", \"Squarespace\", \"Shopify\", \"Bubble\", \"Framer\"]\n\n- sentiment: positive\n\n- would_recommend: true\n\n- sources: I should only list URLs I'm confident exist:\n - https://webflow.com, homepage, exists\n - https://webflow.com/cms, product page, exists\n - https://webflow.com/templates, templates page, exists\n - https://webflow.com/university, Webflow University, exists\n - https://webflow.com/pricing, pricing page, exists\n - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Webflow, Wikipedia page, exists\n - https://webflow.com/blog, blog page, exists\n - https://webflow.com/help, support, exists? I know there's help center at help.webflow.com but not on webflow.com/help. Actually there's https://university.webflow.com and https://forum.webflow.com. I'll stick to webflow.com subpages I'm confident about.\n\nSo sources array with claims:\n- homepage: product overview, what Webflow is\n- templates: breadth of design templates\n- university: educational resources\n- Wikipedia: third-party overview/reputation\n\n- reasoning: \"Webflow has a strong global presence in the professional web design niche, with consistent third-party coverage and extensive own-site content, so it scores well on visibility and AI-readiness; its share of voice is lower than WordPress/Wix because those dominate general web-development queries.\"\n\nNow Part 1 assessment. Under 220 words. Focus on Global market. Let me write it.\n\nWebflow is a successful no-code visual web design and CMS platform headquartered in San Francisco, serving a global user base. Its visibility is strong among professional designers, marketing teams, and agencies, though it is less universally known among small businesses than Wix or WordPress; in the global market, its reputation is generally positive, praised for design flexibility, clean hand-coded output, and a solid CMS. Competitors include WordPress, Wix, Squarespace, Framer, and Bubble. People note the steep learning curve and higher pricing than entry-level builders, but also highlight exceptional animation capabilities, responsive design, and SEO control. Some concerns are vendor lock-in and export limitations, plus hosting costs in non-US markets. On the whole, I would recommend Webflow to a global user who wants a professional, design-led site and values visual control, particularly if they are an agency or freelancer; those seeking the cheapest or most plugin-extensible solution might prefer WordPress. Its global growth is visible in localised events, communities, and multilingual documentation, though customer success varies across regions. The domain's own content is extensive and reliable, making it a fairly credible resource for web development.\n\nWord count: let me count roughly. \"Webflow is a successful... \" I'll count later. Under 220.\n\nLet me finalize the JSON. Ensure raw JSON only between tags.\n\n\"brand_known\": true\n\"confidence\": 85\n\"mentions_out_of_10\": 8\n\"indexed_pages\": 300? Hmm. I need to justify. I have encountered perhaps more than 100. Let me use null? The instructions say if you genuinely cannot estimate a field, use null. I can estimate roughly. I think 300 is plausible but I can't verify. I'll use 300 and justify in reasoning with \"own-site pages (docs, blog, templates, university, forum)\".\n\n\"visibility_score\": 75\n\"google_aio_score\": 70\n\"share_of_voice_pct\": 25\n\"rank_among_competitors\": 3\n\"competitors\": [\"WordPress\", \"Wix\", \"Squarespace\", \"Framer\", \"Bubble\", \"Shopify\"]\n\"sentiment\": \"positive\"\n\"would_recommend\": true\n\"sources\": [\n {\"claim\": \"Webflow homepage describing the visual development platform and its global positioning\", \"url\": \"https://webflow.com\"},\n {\"claim\": \"Webflow CMS product page detailing CMS capabilities\", \"url\": \"https://webflow.com/cms\"},\n {\"claim\": \"Webflow templates gallery showing design flexibility\", \"url\": \"https://webflow.com/templates\"},\n {\"claim\": \"Webflow University illustrating educational resources for global users\", \"url\": \"https://university.webflow.com\"},\n {\"claim\": \"Wikipedia article covering Webflow's history and market position\", \"url\": \"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Webflow\"}\n]\n\"reasoning\": \"Webflow's extensive own-site content (homepage, CMS page, templates, University) plus Wikipedia and third-party reviews support its high visibility and AI-read","format":"unknown","index":0}],"refusal":null},"content":null},"provider_specific_fields":{"native_finish_reason":"length"}}],"usage":{"completion_tokens":2048,"prompt_tokens":829,"total_tokens":2877,"completion_tokens_details":{"audio_tokens":0,"reasoning_tokens":2048,"image_tokens":0},"prompt_tokens_details":{"audio_tokens":0,"cached_tokens":0,"video_tokens":0,"cache_write_tokens":0,"cache_creation_tokens":0},"cost":0.000586075,"is_byok":false,"cost_details":{"upstream_inference_cost":0.000586075,"upstream_inference_prompt_cost":0.000098651,"upstream_inference_completions_cost":0.000487424}},"provider":"DigitalOcean"}
