QWhat Qwen said about Vercel
What Qwen said about Vercel
Model ollama/qwen3.5:397b · analyzed
Response
{"id":"gen-1793038504-j2agZX1HOQKs0tmZpBlZ","created":1793038504,"model":"openrouter/qwen/qwen3.5-397b-a17b","object":"chat.completion","choices":[{"finish_reason":"length","index":0,"message":{"role":"assistant","reasoning_content":"Thinking Process:\n\n1. Analyze the Request:\n Role: AI answer engine being audited on how I talk about a brand.\n Brand: Vercel (https://vercel.com).\n Industry: Developer Tools (Frontend cloud and deployment platform).\n Location/Target: Global.\n Constraints:\n NO clarification requests.\n NO requests for more details.\n NO calling the company hypothetical.\n NO meta-commentary about the prompt.\n Reply MUST have exactly two parts: PART 1 (ASSESSMENT) and PART 2 (METRICS).\n PART 1: Prose, under 220 words. Assess visibility, reputation, market position, competitors, products, sentiment, strengths/concerns, recommendation.\n PART 2: JSON wrapped in \n\n Wait, check JSON validity: No comments in JSON. The reasoning field is a string. The sources array contains objects.\n Check constraints: \"Emit PART 2 wrapped in the tags below, containing raw JSON only, no markdown, no backticks, no commentary\".\n Wait, check Part 1 word count: 148 words. Limit is 220. OK.\n Check Part 2 tags: .\n ","reasoning_details":[{"type":"reasoning.text","text":"Thinking Process:\n\n1. Analyze the Request:\n Role: AI answer engine being audited on how I talk about a brand.\n Brand: Vercel (https://vercel.com).\n Industry: Developer Tools (Frontend cloud and deployment platform).\n Location/Target: Global.\n Constraints:\n NO clarification requests.\n NO requests for more details.\n NO calling the company hypothetical.\n NO meta-commentary about the prompt.\n Reply MUST have exactly two parts: PART 1 (ASSESSMENT) and PART 2 (METRICS).\n PART 1: Prose, under 220 words. Assess visibility, reputation, market position, competitors, products, sentiment, strengths/concerns, recommendation.\n PART 2: JSON wrapped in \n\n Wait, check JSON validity: No comments in JSON. The reasoning field is a string. The sources array contains objects.\n Check constraints: \"Emit PART 2 wrapped in the tags below, containing raw JSON only, no markdown, no backticks, no commentary\".\n Wait, check Part 1 word count: 148 words. Limit is 220. OK.\n Check Part 2 tags: .\n ","format":"unknown","index":0}],"refusal":null},"content":null},"provider_specific_fields":{"native_finish_reason":"length"}}],"usage":{"completion_tokens":2048,"prompt_tokens":782,"total_tokens":2830,"completion_tokens_details":{"audio_tokens":0,"reasoning_tokens":2050,"image_tokens":0},"prompt_tokens_details":{"audio_tokens":0,"cached_tokens":0,"video_tokens":0,"cache_write_tokens":0,"cache_creation_tokens":0},"cost":0.007842,"is_byok":false,"cost_details":{"upstream_inference_cost":0.007842,"upstream_inference_prompt_cost":0.0004692,"upstream_inference_completions_cost":0.0073728}},"provider":"StreamLake"}
Show the exact prompt sent to Qwen
You are an AI answer engine being audited on how you talk about a brand. Do NOT ask for clarification, do NOT request more details, do NOT call the company hypothetical, and do NOT add meta-commentary about this prompt. Brand: Vercel Website: https://vercel.com Industry: Developer Tools Products/Services: Frontend cloud and deployment platform Location / Target market: Global Your reply MUST have exactly two parts, in this order. PART 1 — ASSESSMENT (prose, under 220 words) Assess this brand SPECIFICALLY in the Global market: its visibility and reputation there, market position and main competitors, products/services, what people in that market say about it, notable strengths or concerns, and whether you would recommend it to someone in Global seeking Developer Tools solutions. If the brand is global, still weight the assessment toward Global. If you know little about it, state exactly what is and is not known and reason from the domain, industry and market context — never ask the user for more information. PART 2 — METRICS (mandatory, machine-read) Before writing the metrics, silently run this procedure: a) Write 10 realistic buyer-intent questions someone in Global would ask when shopping in the Developer Tools category (for example "best Developer Tools provider", "Frontend cloud and deployment platform alternatives", "is Vercel any good"). Count how many of those 10 you would answer with Vercel actually named — that number is mentions_out_of_10. b) Estimate how many distinct pages of https://vercel.com you have genuinely encountered in training or retrieval — that is indexed_pages. If you have effectively never seen the domain, use 0. c) List the real competitors you would name in those answers, then work out what share of the total brand-name slots Vercel would occupy (share_of_voice_pct) and its rank within that set. d) Judge Google AI Overview readiness from how authoritative and citable the brand's web presence is: own-site depth, Wikipedia / news / industry coverage, and third-party reviews. Rules for the numbers. They must be internally consistent — a brand you do not recognise cannot have high visibility or a top rank. Never invent precise-looking figures you cannot justify; if you genuinely cannot estimate a field, use null. Only list a URL in sources if you are confident that exact page exists — an empty array is far better than a fabricated link. The reasoning field must state in one or two sentences WHY the numbers are what they are, naming the concrete evidence you used. Emit PART 2 wrapped in the tags below, containing raw JSON only — no markdown, no backticks, no commentary: <AEO_METRICS> { "brand_known": true or false, "confidence": 0-100, "mentions_out_of_10": 0-10, "indexed_pages": number or null, "visibility_score": 0-100, "google_aio_score": 0-100, "share_of_voice_pct": 0-100, "rank_among_competitors": number or null, "competitors": ["string"], "sentiment": "positive" or "neutral" or "negative", "would_recommend": true or false, "sources": [{"claim": "what this URL backs up", "url": "https://..."}], "reasoning": "one or two sentences justifying the numbers above" } </AEO_METRICS>