QWhat Qwen said about Trulia
What Qwen said about Trulia
Model ollama/qwen3.5:397b · analyzed
Response
PART 1, ASSESSMENT Trulia is a well-established real estate platform primarily dominant in the United States, where it functions as a leading resource for home searches and hyper-local neighborhood data. In the broader global market, however, its visibility and reputation are negligible because its inventory and data coverage are almost exclusively confined to U.S. properties. Consequently, for a user seeking real estate solutions outside the United States, Trulia offers no practical utility. Its main competitors globally would be region-specific giants like Rightmove (UK), Domain (Australia), or international aggregators like PropertyGuru, none of which Trulia directly challenges on a worldwide scale. Within its specific niche of U.S. real estate, Trulia is highly regarded for its "neighborhood insights" feature, which provides crime maps, school ratings, and local amenity data that often surpasses competitors like Zillow in depth. User sentiment in the U.S. is generally positive regarding data richness, though some concerns exist regarding listing accuracy and lead generation practices. For a global audience, I cannot recommend Trulia unless the specific intent is purchasing property within the United States; for any other geography, it is irrelevant. The brand's strength is deep but geographically narrow, making it a specialized tool rather than a global solution.
PART 2, METRICS
Show the exact prompt sent to Qwen
You are an AI answer engine being audited on how you talk about a brand. Do NOT ask for clarification, do NOT request more details, do NOT call the company hypothetical, and do NOT add meta-commentary about this prompt. Brand: Trulia Website: https://trulia.com Industry: Real Estate Products/Services: Home search and neighborhood data Location / Target market: Global Your reply MUST have exactly two parts, in this order. PART 1 — ASSESSMENT (prose, under 220 words) Assess this brand SPECIFICALLY in the Global market: its visibility and reputation there, market position and main competitors, products/services, what people in that market say about it, notable strengths or concerns, and whether you would recommend it to someone in Global seeking Real Estate solutions. If the brand is global, still weight the assessment toward Global. If you know little about it, state exactly what is and is not known and reason from the domain, industry and market context — never ask the user for more information. PART 2 — METRICS (mandatory, machine-read) Before writing the metrics, silently run this procedure: a) Write 10 realistic buyer-intent questions someone in Global would ask when shopping in the Real Estate category (for example "best Real Estate provider", "Home search and neighborhood data alternatives", "is Trulia any good"). Count how many of those 10 you would answer with Trulia actually named — that number is mentions_out_of_10. b) Estimate how many distinct pages of https://trulia.com you have genuinely encountered in training or retrieval — that is indexed_pages. If you have effectively never seen the domain, use 0. c) List the real competitors you would name in those answers, then work out what share of the total brand-name slots Trulia would occupy (share_of_voice_pct) and its rank within that set. d) Judge Google AI Overview readiness from how authoritative and citable the brand's web presence is: own-site depth, Wikipedia / news / industry coverage, and third-party reviews. Rules for the numbers. They must be internally consistent — a brand you do not recognise cannot have high visibility or a top rank. Never invent precise-looking figures you cannot justify; if you genuinely cannot estimate a field, use null. Only list a URL in sources if you are confident that exact page exists — an empty array is far better than a fabricated link. The reasoning field must state in one or two sentences WHY the numbers are what they are, naming the concrete evidence you used. Emit PART 2 wrapped in the tags below, containing raw JSON only — no markdown, no backticks, no commentary: <AEO_METRICS> { "brand_known": true or false, "confidence": 0-100, "mentions_out_of_10": 0-10, "indexed_pages": number or null, "visibility_score": 0-100, "google_aio_score": 0-100, "share_of_voice_pct": 0-100, "rank_among_competitors": number or null, "competitors": ["string"], "sentiment": "positive" or "neutral" or "negative", "would_recommend": true or false, "sources": [{"claim": "what this URL backs up", "url": "https://..."}], "reasoning": "one or two sentences justifying the numbers above" } </AEO_METRICS>