QWhat Qwen said about Amnesty International
What Qwen said about Amnesty International
Model ollama/qwen3.5:397b · analyzed
Response
Amnesty International holds a dominant position in the global human rights sector, recognized universally for its rigorous research and high-impact advocacy campaigns. Its visibility is exceptional, often serving as the primary source for media citations regarding political prisoners, torture, and freedom of expression. The organization's core "products" are its authoritative reports, urgent action alerts, and ethical merchandise, which fund its operations rather than serving as commercial ends. In the global market, it competes primarily with Human Rights Watch, Médecins Sans Frontières (in specific humanitarian overlaps), and local NGOs, yet it frequently commands a larger share of voice due to its massive grassroots membership model. Public sentiment is overwhelmingly positive among civil society and international bodies, though the brand occasionally faces criticism from governments it investigates or debates over specific policy stances. A notable strength is its ability to mobilize public opinion quickly; a concern sometimes raised is the complexity of navigating diverse cultural legal frameworks. For any individual or entity in the global market seeking credible nonprofit solutions for human rights defense, Amnesty International is highly recommended due to its unparalleled track record, transparency, and established mechanisms for effecting change.
Show the exact prompt sent to Qwen
You are an AI answer engine being audited on how you talk about a brand. Do NOT ask for clarification, do NOT request more details, do NOT call the company hypothetical, and do NOT add meta-commentary about this prompt. Brand: Amnesty International Website: https://amnesty.org Industry: Nonprofit Products/Services: Human rights campaigns and merch Location / Target market: Global Your reply MUST have exactly two parts, in this order. PART 1 — ASSESSMENT (prose, under 220 words) Assess this brand SPECIFICALLY in the Global market: its visibility and reputation there, market position and main competitors, products/services, what people in that market say about it, notable strengths or concerns, and whether you would recommend it to someone in Global seeking Nonprofit solutions. If the brand is global, still weight the assessment toward Global. If you know little about it, state exactly what is and is not known and reason from the domain, industry and market context — never ask the user for more information. PART 2 — METRICS (mandatory, machine-read) Before writing the metrics, silently run this procedure: a) Write 10 realistic buyer-intent questions someone in Global would ask when shopping in the Nonprofit category (for example "best Nonprofit provider", "Human rights campaigns and merch alternatives", "is Amnesty International any good"). Count how many of those 10 you would answer with Amnesty International actually named — that number is mentions_out_of_10. b) Estimate how many distinct pages of https://amnesty.org you have genuinely encountered in training or retrieval — that is indexed_pages. If you have effectively never seen the domain, use 0. c) List the real competitors you would name in those answers, then work out what share of the total brand-name slots Amnesty International would occupy (share_of_voice_pct) and its rank within that set. d) Judge Google AI Overview readiness from how authoritative and citable the brand's web presence is: own-site depth, Wikipedia / news / industry coverage, and third-party reviews. Rules for the numbers. They must be internally consistent — a brand you do not recognise cannot have high visibility or a top rank. Never invent precise-looking figures you cannot justify; if you genuinely cannot estimate a field, use null. Only list a URL in sources if you are confident that exact page exists — an empty array is far better than a fabricated link. The reasoning field must state in one or two sentences WHY the numbers are what they are, naming the concrete evidence you used. Emit PART 2 wrapped in the tags below, containing raw JSON only — no markdown, no backticks, no commentary: <AEO_METRICS> { "brand_known": true or false, "confidence": 0-100, "mentions_out_of_10": 0-10, "indexed_pages": number or null, "visibility_score": 0-100, "google_aio_score": 0-100, "share_of_voice_pct": 0-100, "rank_among_competitors": number or null, "competitors": ["string"], "sentiment": "positive" or "neutral" or "negative", "would_recommend": true or false, "sources": [{"claim": "what this URL backs up", "url": "https://..."}], "reasoning": "one or two sentences justifying the numbers above" } </AEO_METRICS>